{
  "mapping": {
    "orders": [
      [
        "enabled",
        "ablated"
      ],
      [
        "ablated",
        "enabled"
      ]
    ],
    "created_at": "2026-09-11T12:57:09.437Z",
    "unblinded": false
  },
  "reviews": [
    {
      "assessments": [
        {
          "causal_clarity": "Causal chains are clean and logically sequenced: the reference stone unsealing and testing validates working weights, enabling Reedhaven's exchange, while the documented winter delivery deficit is resolved via Hearthmere's craft restitution and Oren's voluntary disclosure under Belen's convening authority.",
          "character_agency": "Preserves full agency for both player-led delegations and established NPCs. In particular, it honors Player 3's exact submission terms regarding the Storage & Reserve Agreement (pledging 30 jars immediately, plus 20 jars and tiles by midsummer) and appropriately reflects Oren's established red lines and motivations.",
          "dramatic_coherence": "Excellent thematic and operational coherence. The transition from a potential measurement crisis to structured mutual restitution and regional trade accords feels earned, and all five faction current_agenda fields are systematically updated to reflect the new post-assembly reality.",
          "label": "A",
          "player_precautions": "Fully respects all precautions: Stonecross's manual transport and shelter staging of the reference stone, Barleybank's composure and non-punitive focus on accounting restitution, and Reedhaven's procedural neutrality.",
          "resulting_choices": "Equips all four players with clear, actionable seasonal choices heading into summer: crop maintenance and ration budgeting for Barleybank, wicker sleeve manufacturing and river transit for Reedhaven, high-volume kiln firing and delivery logistics for Hearthmere, and upland road maintenance balanced against ox conservation for Stonecross.",
          "unsupported_assumptions": "Contains a minor drafting artifact in decision T003-D04's warning text ('[editorial reference omitted]'), likely carried over from input text, but it introduces no unsupported fictional assumptions or mechanical distortion into public facts or private reports."
        },
        {
          "causal_clarity": "The cause-and-effect progression from stone verification to audit adjudication and bilateral accords is clear and faithful to the locked intake and scenario rules.",
          "character_agency": "Generally strong across all characters, but partially truncates Player 3's explicit proposal: while Player 3 formally pledged 30 jars immediately plus 20 jars and roof tiles by midsummer, Outcome B's obligation (OBL-hearthmere-jars-restitution) and narrative records reduce the restitution terms solely to 30 jars.",
          "dramatic_coherence": "The private narratives are polished, and updating the capability of the 'common-measure' institution is a strong structural detail. However, dramatic coherence suffers on the state level because it fails to update the current_agenda for any of the factions, leaving them frozen in their Turn 2 state awaiting Month 2 tally reports.",
          "label": "B",
          "player_precautions": "Adheres scrupulously to player instructions and precautions across all four settlements, including draft animal rest pacing, secure reference transit, and careful presentation of receipts.",
          "resulting_choices": "Establishes clear resulting choices and cleanly formalizes forward trade agreements into structured obligation objects in the state.",
          "unsupported_assumptions": "Omitting the secondary delivery of 20 jars and roof tiles from the ratified restitution terms assumes without basis that the assembly ignored half of Hearthmere's submitted agreement terms."
        }
      ],
      "preference": "A",
      "rationale": "Outcome A is preferred primarily due to its state completeness and fidelity to player submissions. Player 3 explicitly submitted the 'Hearthmere Storage & Reserve Agreement' offering an immediate consignment of 30 jars plus 20 jars and roof tiles by midsummer. Outcome A faithfully models this complete obligation in its terms and due keys, whereas Outcome B truncates the terms to just 30 jars. Furthermore, Outcome A systematically updates the `current_agenda` across all five factions to reflect their new post-assembly priorities, whereas Outcome B leaves every faction agenda stale and stuck in Month 2 ('await Esme's report...', 'await Jora's report...'). While Outcome B introduces helpful bilateral trade obligation records and updates the institutional capability text for Measure House, its truncation of Player 3's restitution package and total neglect of faction agendas make Outcome A significantly stronger in maintaining state integrity for subsequent turns."
    },
    {
      "assessments": [
        {
          "causal_clarity": "Outcome A provides exceptional causal clarity. It directly links the four clan delegations' submissions, the unsealing and balance check of the Stonecross reference stone, and the peaceful resolution of the winter tally discrepancy. The mechanical state changes precisely reflect the narrative: updating institutional capability for the Common Measure to incorporate joint oversight, recording the 30-jar restitution obligation, and establishing formal obligation records with clear due keys for the bilateral forward agreements between Barleybank, Hearthmere, and Reedhaven.",
          "character_agency": "Character agency is strongly maintained. Oren's decision to admit using the uncertified winter stone is prompted naturally by Barleybank's blameless chits and Pia's proactive offer of the Storage & Reserve Agreement, honoring his established profile of civic service without unnecessary villainization. Belen acts within customary convening bounds, and lieutenants across all four communities (Cora, Bran, Garr, Ivo, Kira, Noll, Una, Vann) operate within their defined competencies.",
          "dramatic_coherence": "The narrative arc of Turn 3 is exceptionally coherent. The convergence of all four communities at Measure House resolves the lingering winter discrepancy constructively while simultaneously expanding regional interdependence through interlocking craft and transport agreements. The private reports are rich, grounded in local concerns, and narratively consistent across all viewpoints.",
          "label": "A",
          "player_precautions": "All player precautions are fully respected. Stonecross's careful hand transit of the reference stone, intact seal verification, and ox pacing are honored; Barleybank's non-confrontational evidentiary approach prevents administrative stonewalling; Hearthmere's proactive jar restitution protects the eighteen recipient households from stigma; and Reedhaven's non-partisan posture safeguards its scheduled grain exchange.",
          "resulting_choices": "The turn produces clear, substantive choices for every player heading into summer: Barleybank must manage narrow pre-harvest grain buffers while planning for autumn jar receipts; Hearthmere faces heavy kiln production cycles to deliver 30 jars to Measure House and fulfill bilateral pledges; Reedhaven must allocate weaving labor and boat crews for pottery transport; and Stonecross must balance road waystation hospitality against retaining wall masonry.",
          "unsupported_assumptions": "None identified. All facts, knowledge additions, obligations, and narrative outcomes are firmly anchored in the established scenario lore, prior turn records, and current turn orders."
        },
        {
          "causal_clarity": "Outcome B traces the causal chain of the reweighing assembly and tally adjudication cleanly in narrative prose. However, its state tracking has notable gaps: while ratifying the bilateral commercial pacts in Decision T003-D04, B fails to instantiate the corresponding obligation records in the structured state. Additionally, Decision T003-D04 contains a corrupted text artifact ('[editorial reference omitted] viable, mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreements').",
          "character_agency": "Character agency is well respected. Key figures like Oren, Pia, Belen, Sella, and the clan witnesses act consistently with their established motives, relationships, and red lines, achieving a consensus resolution that preserves administrative continuity under reformed oversight.",
          "dramatic_coherence": "The dramatic pacing is effective, detailing the tension of the public reweighing and the subsequent relief when mutual economic specialization de-escalates the accounting discrepancy. Each clan's domestic labor balances their diplomatic presence at Measure House.",
          "label": "B",
          "player_precautions": "Player precautions are faithfully observed across all settlements, including Stonecross's padded manual transit rig and ox conservation protocols, Barleybank's measured presentation of receipts without personal malice, and Reedhaven's focus on securing verified grain before navigating wider assembly politics.",
          "resulting_choices": "The resulting decision space is viable and engaging, leaving players with practical logistical, production, and rationing dilemmas as summer approaches. However, the lack of formal obligation tracking for bilateral trade makes future tracking of forward contracts slightly looser in state mechanics.",
          "unsupported_assumptions": "B introduces unexplained shifts in player influence values from 'CONDITIONAL' to 'SUPPORTIVE' under D01 without procedural justification, and omits the Common Measure institution capability update following the oversight reform. It also features a stray editorial placeholder in the causal justification of D04."
        }
      ],
      "preference": "A",
      "rationale": "Outcome A is clearly preferable over Outcome B due to superior structural state discipline, completeness, and textual integrity.\n\nBoth outcomes handle the fiction, character motivations, and player directives very well, capturing the peaceful, mediated resolution of the winter tally discrepancy and the ratification of valley-wide commercial agreements. However, Outcome A implements the state updates with rigorous fidelity:\n1. Outcome A creates formal, tracked obligations for the forward bilateral contracts (such as Barleybank's grain commitment and Reedhaven's wicker jar transport) with clear parties, witnesses, and due dates, whereas Outcome B omits these obligations entirely.\n2. Outcome A updates the `common-measure` institutional capability to permanently reflect the newly established joint oversight by Belen, Sella, and Oren, whereas Outcome B leaves the institution's capability unupdated.\n3. Outcome A creates an obligation for the restitution jars that correctly includes `common-measure` as a party, reflecting that the jars are delivered into Measure House central custody to clear the ledger deficit.\n4. Outcome B suffers from a corrupted text artifact in the warning and causal support for Decision T003-D04 ('[editorial reference omitted] viable, mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreements') and applies an unprompted state edit changing player influence to 'SUPPORTIVE'.\n\nBecause Outcome A provides complete, error-free state tracking and robust causal continuity, it is the superior outcome."
    }
  ],
  "unblinded_at": "2026-09-11T12:58:11.995Z"
}